|  | British Rainfall 1897 page18 It will be noticed that in the following table we have  
included the records for 1896, whereas in British  
Rainfall, 1895, the Seathwaite ratios could only be  
given down to 1895; we have of course determined the ratio  
for 1896, viz., 91.
 It will give some idea of the work needed for the  
preparation of such a paper as this, if we mention that  
records from 147 stations have been utilized, and that the  
aggregate number of yearly records dealt with has been 1,612 
- an average of eleven years for each station, - the  
Seathwaite record of 52 years being the longest, but  
followed by a 49 year record at Keswick, by two of 42 years  
(Coniston and Mirehouse, Basenthwaite), and by one of 41  
years at Whinfell Hall.
 We do not put forward the work as perfect, either as regards 
the observations or the calculations, but nearly all the  
observations appear correct, and we see no prospect of  
better ones being available for years to come; and as  
regards the extraction of the data and the calculations,  
much of both has been done in duplicate, and only one error  
(amounting to less than a tenth-of-an-inch at one station)  
has been detected, so that we trust that there is no fear of 
anything serious having escaped detection, or of the general 
conclusions hereinafter stated being materially modifed by  
another half-century's work.
 In the following tables the stations are given separately  
for each county, viz., Lancashire, Cumberland and  
Westmoreland, and in each county they follow very nearly in  
the usual order from south to north.
 Having explained how the mean values given (for each  
station) in the last column have been arrived at, we have to 
add a few words of comment.
 As will be explained further on, the mean rainfall given in  
the last column is also given upon the accompanying map, but 
in some instances the stations are so close one to another  
that the figures could not all be printed, and in all such  
cases it will be noted that the stations are bracketed  
together, and the mean of the group is stated; this is the  
case with entries 2 to 5 inclusive, and it will perhaps be  
wondered why the average is entered as 67 instead of 71,  
which is the average of the four entries. The answer is,  
that reference to the previous column will show that two of  
the values are base each on only one year's observations,  
whereas the others depend on nine and on ten years  
respectively; and in working out the mean, the greater  
import
 
 |