|
Stone Age Tools
Kendal, Aug. 24.
Mr. URBAN,
IT appears from the discoveries of modern travellers, that
in countries where iron has not been introduced, various
hard bodies are substituted in its room by the natives; and
the works they are able to accomplish, by instruments made
of very unlikely materials, are truly surprising; their
boats, their bows, and spears, are neatly formed, and
curiously carved, with tools consisteing of nothing but
stones, bones, shells, and various kinds of hard wood.
Now, since we are convinced by actual observation that man,
in one part of the world can perform various mechanical
operations by the help of such implements alone, it cannot
be questioned that the inhabitants of a different climate
would have recourse to the same methods under similar
circumstances; and it is highly probable that the
predecessors of the polished Europeans have, at some distant
period, made use of such instruments as are now employed by
the savages of America and the Southern islands. It would be
in vain to expect, that the history of any nation should
furnish facts to establish this opinion from the customs of
the people whose transactions it commemorates, for man must
always make a considerable progress in civilization before
he will attend to letters; and as metals are so necessary to
his refinement, these instruments have been laid aside and
forgot in every country before the commencement of its
history. Hence it happens that it is in the annals of more
polished nations alone we find proofs of their existence,
when the historians accidentally mentions the manners of his
ruder neighbours. Thus it appears from Exodus iv. 25, that
the Midianites used a sharp stone instead of a knife in the
time of Moses. Stones and clubs were undoubtedly the first
offensive weapons; and it is positively asserted by Pliny,
that the latter were used by the Libyans in an antient war
which this people had with the Egyptians. An author, whose
name at present I cannot recollect, informs us, that the
maritime nations of Italy formerly pointed their darts with
the bony termination of the tail of the fireflair. Tacitus
says, that the Germans, in his time, headed their spears
very sparingly with iron, which they obtained by barter from
the Gauls and Italians; but that the Finni, a very extensive
tribe, but ruder than the rest, without cattle, and without
habitations, depended on their bows for subsistence; and it
would be folly to suppose that a people, thus destitute in
arts and commerce; could procure any other tips for their
arrows than those of the simplest kind. Perhaps more
circumstantial proofs of the primitive simplicity of our
ancestors might be brought to light, by an attentive enquiry
into the subject; but the facts abovementioned are
sufficient to make it appear, that both Europe and Asia have
been indebted for their conveniences to those things which
constitute the arts and riches of a modern savage.
There is not, as far as I know, any historic evidence
proving that these primitive instruments were ever used by
the antient Britons. Julius Caesar, who describes their
manners, found them possessed of copper and iron, though
sufficiently barbarous in other respects; the former they
obtained by commerce, and the latter was extracted from the
ore by the inhabitants of the coast, who, being of Gallic
extractions, were acquainted with the arts of the Continent.
By this early intercocurse between our ancestors and their
more cultivated neighbours, the Romans were prevented from
observing those sequestered islanders in their native
simplicity: they had surmounted the more destitute condition
of savage life previous to the first visit of their
conquerors; and before the commencement of their history
they were become too sensible of the superior advantages of
metals, to depend on implements made of more imperfect
materials. But the researches of the Antiquary have supplied
the defects of written records, flints are found in
different parts of Scotland, which have been fashioned with
great labour into the heads of arrows. The stone from which
these views are given (pl.II. fig. 6, 7, 8) is of the
same date, and from the same hands. It was found in a
rivulet in the North of Cumberland. The peculiarity of its
form renders it impossible to determine its precise use. It
has evidently been intended for an offensive weapon, and its
employer, in all probability, either tied it to the end of a
thong, or fixed it in a wicker handle. If we suppose it to
have ebeen an instrument of
|