|
Gentleman's Magazine 1742 p.31
placed on the right side of the altar seems a corroborating
proof of it.
2. If the form of the character N at the beginning of the
third line would admit of it standing for AV [ligature] the
obvious reading here would be et numini Augusti; but
as I understand it will not, the most probable reading that
occurs to me is, et numini Domini nostri, the letter
D being supplied at the end of the second line, Thus we have
another British inscription with the words, et numini
domini nostri Augusti, Horsley Northumb. LXXX; as
Gordian is afterwards titled in this.
3. The form of the character N for AN in the last line of
this inscription seems to support the gentleman's opinion,
who takes IW at the end of the third line to stand for
Tun, and then no doubt Tungrorum. is the true
reading of that word.
4. The insertion of the ancient M between the lines, which
has been omitted by the workman, being placed over the word
GOR. and before the following point, induces me to give it
this reading. Vegetius speaking of the first cohort of a
legion sais: Habet pedites mille centrum quinque, equites
locatos centum triginta duos, et appellatur cohors miliaria
Lib II. c.6. The cohort therefore received its name
miliaria or millenaria from the number of
common foot soldiers, who were a thousand, the additional
hundred and five being subaltern officers, as Stewechius
shews upon the place. Vegetius indeed ascribes these numbers
both of the foot and horse only to the first cohort of a
legion, and a less number of each to the other cohorts; but
under the lower emperours, and especially in the provinces,
it seems by inscriptions, as if those numbers were not
always regularly observed. And therefore this second cohort,
which was honoured with the name of the emperour, exceeded
the common number both in the foot and horse, might possibly
occasion its being particularly mentioned.
7. I think the vacant space in this line after the letter D
very well suits with the conjecture of the gentleman, who
reads the name Claudianus.
8. Instante here seems to denote the same as
curante in some other British inscriptions, Horsl.
Durham XI, XII. So Pliny Panegyr. c.18 sais
Instant operibus, speaking of the officers, who
directed the soldiers works.
10. Princeps is a proper name, which occurs several
times in Gruter. The small letter i placed in the belly of
the L stands, as I suppose, for the name of the month, which
might either be omitted at first, or placed in that manner
for want of room.
11. But the most considerable doubt which occurs in the
inscription, is this; that it makes the Emperour Gordian
colleague with Pompeianus in his third cosulate,
which the fasti consulares ascribe to the second. Nor
is any mention made of this third consulate any where, but
here, and in another inscription given to us by GRUTER,
p. MLXXXV. n.10; which I conclude therefore
must be a mistake, especially since in several others of
Gruter's inscriptions Pompeianus is joined with him
in his second consulate, agreeably to the fasti.
The two fragments of the glass bowl with the name AKTAI[O]N
on one, and a dog's head on the other, cut with an adamant,
as is supposed, are very curious. It is a great pity the
bowl had not been preserved intire.
The pedestals here mentioned as found in the wood, where the
fort was, are, I suppose, pillars erected for the support of
an hot bath, and the hollow instrument made of clay, a tube
for carrying off the smoke. This will be more evident by
comparing these remains with the draught of the hypocaust
found at Lincoln, and published by the antiquary society of
London. I wish a more accurate description had been given of
the whole. the space it contain'd, and particularly the
matter and dimensions of the pillars, as likewise whether
any cinders or ashes were found there.
J. WARD
N.B.The other, Letters concerning this Piece of Antiquity
must be, referred to our next.
|