|  
 |  
 
Gentleman's Magazine 1843 part 2 p.453 
  
He then lays down the principles on which all right judgment 
of art must be founded, in order that the terms and language 
in which his critical judgments and comparisons are  
expressed, may be thoroughly understood. He distinguishes  
between the painter's intellectual power and his technical  
knowledge; that mere technical painting or colouring is to  
the artist what the power of versifying is to the poet; but  
yet the thought, whether in painting or poetry, is  
intimately connected with the language in which it is  
conveyed: he then distinguishes between language that is  
expressive, and that which is merely decorative or  
ornamental. As, for instance, most pictures of the Dutch  
school, excepting those of Rubens, Vandyck, and Rembrandt,  
are ostentatious exhibitions of the artist's power of  
speech, the clear and vigourous elocution of useless and  
senseless words; while the early efforts of Cimabue and  
Giotto are the warning messages of prophecy declared by the  
stammering lips of infants. We must therefore carefully  
distinguish what is language and what is thought,  
considering the former as an inferior excellence. 
  
 
"The picture which has the nobler and more numerous ideas,  
however awkwardly expressed, is a greater and better picture 
than that which has the less noble and less numerous ideas,  
however beautifully expressed. No weight, nor mass, nor  
beauty of execution can outweigh one grain or fragment of  
thought. Three pen-strokes of Raffaelle are a greater and  
better picture than the most finished work that ever Carlo  
Dolci polished into inanity. A pencil scratch of Wilkie's on 
the back of a letter is a greater and better picture - and I 
use the term picture in its full sense - than the most  
laboured and luminous canvass that ever left the easel of  
Gerard Dow. A finished work of a great artist is only better 
than its sketch if the source of pleasure belonging to  
colour and charioscuro, vauable in themselves, are so  
employed as to increase the impressiveness of the thought.  
But, if one atom of thought has vanished, all colour, all  
finish, all execution, all ornament, are too dearly bought.  
Nothing but thought can pay for thought, and the instant  
that increasing refinement or finish of the picture begins  
to be paid for by the loss of the faintest shadow of an  
idea, that instant all refinement or finish is an  
excressence and a deformity." 
  
The author then gives his definition of what he calls "the  
greatest art," that which conveys to the mind of the  
spectator, by any means whatsoever, the greatest number of  
the greatest ideas; and consequently he is the greatest  
artist who has embodied such ideas in his works. He then  
considers that all the sources of pleasure or good to be  
derived from works of art may be referred to five distinct  
heads - ideas of power, of imitation, of truth, of beauty,  
of relation, - the nature of each of which he distinguishes. 
After having briefly considered the principles respecting  
ideas of power, he commences the second part of his  
work with the idea of truth, which he continues  
through the remainder of the volume, leaving, we presume,  
the consideration of beauty and relation for the portions of 
the work that are to follow. In this discussion there are  
many sound principles laid down, many accurate distinctions  
drawn, many judicious rules enforced, and many elegant  
illustrations brought to the subject. In the application of  
his principles he divides all painters into two great and  
distinct classes, - those who aim at the development of  
truth, and those who look no higher than mere imitation. The 
old masters he ranks in the latter category. "They  
had neither love of nature nor feeling for her beauty; they  
looked for her coldest and most commonplace effects because  
they were easiest to imitate, and for her most vulgar forms  
because they were most easily to be recognised." He then  
observes that the principles of selection by modern  
artists is different, seeking not what is easiest to  
imitate, but for what is most important to tell, and that  
there is 
  
 |