|
British Rainfall 1896 page 19
identical with that taken last year, but with the addition
of the stations now quoted. The Roman numerals refer to the
columns in Tables I. and II., and indicate the site and name
of the station.
The second map is on the large scale of six inches to the
mile, represents the central area enclosed by a black line
on the one-inch map, and thus gives full details as to the
site of The Stye gauges.
Something also should be said representing the
illustrations. The frontispiece is a general view of
Derwentwater, taken from the low ground under Skiddaw, and
looking nearly due south over Keswick and the Lake into the
hills of Borrowdale. The photograph whence this is
reproduced is of especial meteorological interest, because
it so happens that there is a small cloud resting exactly
upon The Stye, and thus at the same time indicating the
position of the gauges and the reason for the amount which
they collect. The total distance from the camera to the
cloud was nine miles.
The other view, facing p.20, is taken from the point marked
C1 on the large-scale map, it was about two-thirds of a mile
south of Seathwaite, and near Stockley Bridge, which, as
shown by the rough scale of altitudes in the margin, is
about 400 feet below The Stye gauges, the positions of which
are indicated by the intersection of the arrows in the top
corner of the plate.
STATION I. - Sca Fell Pike is the loftiest, and has
been the most troublesome and unsatisfactory of all. The
rain gauge has frequently been frozen for some months.
Several times it has been necessary to carry the whole gauge
and ice down to Wasdale (about 2,600 ft. lower) in order to
thaw and measure its contents. Once the observer, who was
carrying down two gauges (weighing nearly a hundredweight),
slipped, and the gauges rolled away and were smashed.
Another time an observer slipped and broke his leg. No gauge
in a locality like the top of Sca Fell Pike is, we think,
likely to give good results; the wind velocity sweeps the
rain over, and so prevents it falling into,
the gauge, and snow by its less density will fare even
worse. It would probably not be difficult to design two
gauges the one of which should collect ten times as much
snow as the other. We are, therefore, not surprised, though
it is not satisfactory, to find that the records from this
station differ very greatly. Dr. Miller's observations
indicate a mean of 75 inches, the subsequent ones, of 94;
but the individual years differ very widely - years of large
fall on the summit being rarely synchronous with
|