|  | British Rainfall 1867 page 10 self sees their fallacy, and points out some of their  
faults; but, though experiments, on a limited scale, have  
been tried from time to time, the question has never been  
fairly grappled. Good suggestions have been dropped here and 
there; and, before anything is actually commenced, all  
previous experiments - those of Dalton, Charnock, Daniell,  
Howard, Miller, Buist of Bombay, Golding of Copenhagen,  
Haughton of St Helena, and others, must be reviewed.
 
 
    
 It appears to me that a rather troublesome and costly  
process is necessary before we can at all presume to decide  
on any instrument for general use, and that it should take  
the form of a series of experiments, with compartments of a  
cubic yard each, sunk in the ground, waterproof, funnel  
shaped at the bottom, with taps and cans. The simplest mode  
of carrying it out would probably be to cut a trench about  
30 ft. long, and 6 ft. deep, in a spot where perfect  
drainage could be secured, and then form the cubes in  
brickwork, lined with Portland cement, leaving a sunk path  
in front, to give access to the cans, as shown in the  
section of one. The cubes could be filled with various  
substances; and by their modification, and at one time  
leaving the taps (C) open, and another closing them - by  
leaving them with no water but the rain, and at other times  
keeping their contents in a state of saturation, we should  
not only go far beyond anything that has been done before,  
but should probably be led to some simple form of instrument 
which, even if not itself correct, might bear a known  
per-centage of error, and be available for differential  
results.
 
 
    
 Wherever these or similar experiiments are tried, a regular  
record must be kept of the dry and wet bulb thermometers,  
and it may also be expedient to try the self-registering  
hygrometers invented by Mr. Vivian, of Torquay, and  
exhibited at the Oxford meeting of the British Association.
 
 |