|  | Cumberland and Westmorland,  
Ancient and Modern 
 
 HISTORICAL AND MISCELLANEOUS REVIEWS.
 
 Cumberland and Westmorland, Ancient and Modern. By J. 
SULLIVAN. 8vo., 171pp. (Whitaker & Co.) - "Through the  
names of places, the oldest and most enduring monuments,"  
remarked William Von Humboldt, "a nation long passed away  
relates as it were, its own destiny; and the only question  
is, whether we yet understand its voice." The interpretation 
of these names is often biassed by the peculiar studies and  
views of the writer. Referring to Mr. Ferguson's "Northmen  
in Cumberland and Westmorland," we have, says Mr. Sullivan,  
Norse against all England; whilst he is perhaps scarcely  
aware of his own tendency to seek for derivations too  
exclusively in the Irish branch of the Celtic language. This 
field has, however, been rarely trodden of late, at least in 
England, for our cousins the Germans have lately produced a  
very valuable Celtic work, Zeuss' Grammatica Celtica. 
With this exception, Mr. Sullivan has given due prominence  
to the claims of each of the immigrant nations, and he  
brings to bear on the examination of his subject an  
acquaintance with no ordinary range of languages, Eastern  
and European. Indeed, we consider this as a most suggestive  
and interesting book. It is to be lamented that we know  
nothing of Celtic, as formerly spoken in England, some  
remnants of Cornish excepted; and that we can only form  
conjectures concerning it from the kindred dialects of  
Brittany, Wales, and Ireland, for it is by no means certain  
that Welch was spoken throughout England.
 Mr. Sullivan considers that the earliest immigrants of  
Europe came in two streams, - the Tatars along the large  
rivers and islands of the north, whose descendants were the  
Finns, Lapps, Esthonians, and Livonians; and the other,  
consisting of the Iberians, the Etruscans, and the  
Illyrians, by the coasts of the Mediterranean. The Tatars  
probably migrated from the north of Asia; the Celts, who  
came in contact with the Iberians, and the Latins, who  
followed the Etruscans, belong to the great Indo-European  
family, whose home was between the northern slope of the  
Himalayas and the Caspian. Of this family there were four  
great divisions - the Celtic, the Greek-Latin, the Gothic,  
and the Slavic. Probably the Caspian divided them, and gave  
them different directions.
 Our author supposes that the first immigrants to Britain  
were some of the Tatar tribes of the stone period, who  
spread along the north coast of Denmark until they could get 
no further (north), and then took to the sea. The date he  
places at about five centuries before the Christian era. We  
give Mr. Sullivan's reasons for this opinion in his own  
words:-
 
  
"Every consonant in standard Irish is capable of two  
pronunciations, a broad and a narrow; the eastern dialect  
still preserves the distinction clearly audible. The vowels  
are divided into broad and narrow; a, o, u being of  
the former kind, e, i of the latter. If there be no  
other overruling cause, the consonant takes its sound from  
the following vowel; and according to a practice now  
ancient, the kind of the medial or final consonant is  
indicated, if necessary, by a preceeding vowel. Thus the  
a vowel in cean only shews the broad sound of  
the n. Some of the Celtic dialects, and many of the  
European languages that received this influence, did not  
preserve its original condition; its existence is now,  
therefore, at least traced in its effects, which form many  
of the most striking changes in modern dialects. Traces of  
this organic peculiarity are strong and general in Russian,  
partial in Danish and Latin, scarcely to be found in the  
Welch, and non-existent in German. Its effects are  
sufficiently ample in the Romance languages, in Anglo-Saxon  
orthography, and in the pronunciation of modern English.  
That this influence belongs to the North is tolerably  
evident; and seeing it is almost prefect in Magyar, and more 
or less traceable in all the langauges of the same stock, we 
may concude that it has come to us through the Tatar  
peoples." 
The immigrants probably arrived in Aberdeenshire: that they  
first reached Scotland infers from the name of the whole  
island, and the present name of Scotland in the Irish  
language - Albion and Alba, the hill-country.  
(Compare the old Italian Alba Longa, the long hill,  
Albanus, &c.) But foreseeing a difficulty as to  
the arrival of these tribes in canoes hollowed out by fire,  
(or even, we suppose, in skin-covered coracles,) he presumes 
that they must have arrived in company with the Celtic  
tribes. It is certain, we may ask, that the  
cromlech-builders had no tools of metal, or was it a point  
of their 
 |