|
Gentleman's Magazine 1843 part 2 p.454
consequently a greater sum of valuable, essential, and
impressive truth in the works of two or three of our leading
modern landscape painters, than in those of all the old
masters put together.
"It appears strange," he says, "to me that any one familiar
with Nature, and fond of her, should not grow weary and sick
at heart among the melancholy and monotonous transcripts of
her which alone can be receieved from the old school of art.
A man accustomed to the broad wild seashore, with its bright
breakers, and free winds, and sounding rocks, and eternal
sensation of tameless power, can scarcely but be angered
when Claude bids him stand still on some paltry, chipped,
and chiselled quay, with porters and wheelbarrows running
against him, to watch a weak, rippling, bound and barriered
water, that has not strength enough in one of its waves to
upset the flower-pots on the wall, or even to fling one jet
of spray over the confining stone. A man accustomed to the
strength and glory of God's mountains, with their soaring
and radiant pinnacles and surging sweeps of measureless
distance, kingdoms in their valleys, and climates upon their
crests, can scarcely but be angered when Salvator bids him
stand still under some contemptible fragment of splintery
crag, which an Alpine snow-wreath would smother in its first
swell, with a stunted bush or two growing out of it, and a
Dudley or Halifax-like volume of manufactory smoke for a
sky. A man accustomed to the grace and infinity of Nature's
foliage, with every vista a cathedral, and every bough a
revelation, can scarcely but be angered when Poussin mocks
him with a black round mass of impenetrable paint, diverging
into feathers instead of leaves, and supported on a stick
instead of a trunk. Who that has one spark of feeling of
what is beautiful or true, would not turn to be refreshed by
the pure and extended realizations of modern art?" &c.
He then gives examples of these truer and higher aims of the
moderns from the works of D. Cox, Copley Fielding, J. D.
Harding, Stanfield, and, above all, John Turner, whom he
calls "glorious in conception, unfathomable in knowledge,
and solitary in power," and compares him to the angel in the
Apocalypse, and other similar persons, whom out of respect
we shall forbear to mention. Having thus applied his general
principles to the respective works of earlier and later
times, he proceeds through the remainder of his volume to
illustrate each separate truth from the pictures of those
artists by whom it is most generally given, commonly from
those of the father of modern art, J. M. W. Turner. He first
takes into consideration those truths that are productive of
what is called "effect," that is to says, truths of tone,
general colour, space, and light; and then he investigaes
the truths of specific form and colour in the four great
component parts of landscape, sky, earth, water, vegetation.
In these very ingenious and eloquent essays, the author
draws numerous comparisons between the general principles
and particular works of the old masters and the modern, and
with such an acquaintance with his subject, that he who is
not convinced by his reasoning, or satisfied with his
specimens of excellence, will still be instructed by the
particular examples through which the general principles are
worked out. It is, however, quite impossible for us to
follow him through such lengthened investigations,
especially as the force and truth of his argument must
depend not only on the accuracy of his general principles,
but on the minute specification of particular examples. We
shall therefore extract such passages from the work as may
afford some not inadequate views of the author's estimate of
the old painters, of the proper and legitimate purposes of
the art he comments on, and of the merits and defects of the
old painters as compared with the modern school.
"I shall endeavour," he says, "in the present portion of the
work to enter with care and impartiality into the
investigation of the claims of the schools of ancient
|