|
Gentleman's Magazine 1843 part 2 p.453
He then lays down the principles on which all right judgment
of art must be founded, in order that the terms and language
in which his critical judgments and comparisons are
expressed, may be thoroughly understood. He distinguishes
between the painter's intellectual power and his technical
knowledge; that mere technical painting or colouring is to
the artist what the power of versifying is to the poet; but
yet the thought, whether in painting or poetry, is
intimately connected with the language in which it is
conveyed: he then distinguishes between language that is
expressive, and that which is merely decorative or
ornamental. As, for instance, most pictures of the Dutch
school, excepting those of Rubens, Vandyck, and Rembrandt,
are ostentatious exhibitions of the artist's power of
speech, the clear and vigourous elocution of useless and
senseless words; while the early efforts of Cimabue and
Giotto are the warning messages of prophecy declared by the
stammering lips of infants. We must therefore carefully
distinguish what is language and what is thought,
considering the former as an inferior excellence.
"The picture which has the nobler and more numerous ideas,
however awkwardly expressed, is a greater and better picture
than that which has the less noble and less numerous ideas,
however beautifully expressed. No weight, nor mass, nor
beauty of execution can outweigh one grain or fragment of
thought. Three pen-strokes of Raffaelle are a greater and
better picture than the most finished work that ever Carlo
Dolci polished into inanity. A pencil scratch of Wilkie's on
the back of a letter is a greater and better picture - and I
use the term picture in its full sense - than the most
laboured and luminous canvass that ever left the easel of
Gerard Dow. A finished work of a great artist is only better
than its sketch if the source of pleasure belonging to
colour and charioscuro, vauable in themselves, are so
employed as to increase the impressiveness of the thought.
But, if one atom of thought has vanished, all colour, all
finish, all execution, all ornament, are too dearly bought.
Nothing but thought can pay for thought, and the instant
that increasing refinement or finish of the picture begins
to be paid for by the loss of the faintest shadow of an
idea, that instant all refinement or finish is an
excressence and a deformity."
The author then gives his definition of what he calls "the
greatest art," that which conveys to the mind of the
spectator, by any means whatsoever, the greatest number of
the greatest ideas; and consequently he is the greatest
artist who has embodied such ideas in his works. He then
considers that all the sources of pleasure or good to be
derived from works of art may be referred to five distinct
heads - ideas of power, of imitation, of truth, of beauty,
of relation, - the nature of each of which he distinguishes.
After having briefly considered the principles respecting
ideas of power, he commences the second part of his
work with the idea of truth, which he continues
through the remainder of the volume, leaving, we presume,
the consideration of beauty and relation for the portions of
the work that are to follow. In this discussion there are
many sound principles laid down, many accurate distinctions
drawn, many judicious rules enforced, and many elegant
illustrations brought to the subject. In the application of
his principles he divides all painters into two great and
distinct classes, - those who aim at the development of
truth, and those who look no higher than mere imitation. The
old masters he ranks in the latter category. "They
had neither love of nature nor feeling for her beauty; they
looked for her coldest and most commonplace effects because
they were easiest to imitate, and for her most vulgar forms
because they were most easily to be recognised." He then
observes that the principles of selection by modern
artists is different, seeking not what is easiest to
imitate, but for what is most important to tell, and that
there is
|