|
Gentleman's Magazine 1842 part 1 p.5
in the matter subject. But the IMAGINATION comprehendeth
only the figure without the matter. Reason," continues the
old Bard, "surmounteth Imagination, and comprehendeth, by
universal looking, (universali consideratione,) the common
Speces;* but the eye of Intelligence
(INTELLECTUS) is higher, for it surmounteth the environning
(ambitum) of the universitie (universe), and
looketh over that by pure subtilty of thought."
And afterwards, in fuller description:-
"IMAGINATION, albeit so that it taketh of wit (ex
sensibus visendi), the beginning to be seen and formen
the figures, algates, although that wit ne were not present,
yet it environneth and comprehendeth all things sensible,
not by reason sensible of deeming, but reason imaginative."
(Non sensibili, sed imaginaria ratione judicandi.)
In these passages, which exhibit some of the earliest
efforts in the English language to stammer out the accents
of philosophy, the word Imaginatio is used as the
name of a power of the mind; it is the Imagination, -
literally from the original; but in a subsequent passage,
our countryman, - as if in apprehension of failing to
express the true meaning of the word with which he, perhaps,
was intimately acquainted, but which is wholly unwarranted
by the Latin text. (Met. 4).
"Philosophers" (he writes) "that highten Stoiciens" (i.e.
are called Stoics) "wend that Images and
sensibilities, that is to say, sensible imaginations,
or els, imaginations of sensible things, were
imprinted into souls fro bodies without forth." Now for this
repetition of "sensible imaginations, or els, imaginations
of sensible things," there are in Boethius no other words
than sensus and imagines.
It was not, indeed, till a far later period that that which
includes the Roman philosophy, that the Latin IMAGINATIO was
advanced to an equal fulness of importance with the Greek
PHANTASIA. In the middle ages, we find their co-efficiency
completely established; and the questions very formally
discussed, whether this power differed at all from
memory, or could, in any respect, be distinguished
from the common sense. All this was, no doubt, well
known to the learned of our own country; but the old
steel-capt philosopher of Malmesbury, though he employs the
two nouns to be the same signification, yet, following the
steps of Aristotle. he defines Phantasy, or Imagination, to
be - "Conception remaining, and by little and little
decaying from and after the act of sense."†
The words are now traced from their native homes, and
implanted as synonyms in our own language; but, that they
were not unanimously received as such, the poem on the
Immortality of the Soul, by Sir John Davies, a contemporary
of Hobbes, is sufficient proof. Davies, who was undoubtedly
a very learned man, had a system to maintain, and in
accordance with it, after devoting a section to each of the
Senses, Seeing, Hearing, Taste, Smell, and
Touch, he allots one to the IMAGINATION, or the
Common Sense, and another to FANTASY. Of the former he
writes:-
"These are the outward instruments of sense;
These are the guards which every thing musts pass,
Ere it approach the mind;'s intelligence,
Or touch the fantasy, wit's looking glass.
|