|
Gentleman's Magazine 1797 p.726
[de]scended in a direct line from the original grantee to
Thomas fifth Lord Wharton, who was created Marquis of
Wharton, and was the father of the Duke of Wharton, "the
scorn and wonder" of his time; who, rebelling against the
Crown of Great Britain, fled to Spain, and died there in
extreme poverty. Leaving no issue, all his titles but that
of baron became extinct; and it does not appear that the
barony was claimed by either of his sisters; of whom Lady
Jane was married, first, to Mr. Holt, of Redgrave, in
Suffolk, and 2dly, to Robert Coke, esq.; and Lady Lucy was
the wife of Sir William Morrice, bart. Their brother having
been in a state of rebellion, it is supposed he was
attainted, and that his titles were consequently declared to
be forfeited; or it is probable that the barony would not
have remained so long without a claimant. I am desirous,
therefore, of knowing whether the titles were so forfeited,
and whether the first Lord Wharton was called to the House
of Peers by writ or patent; and, if by the latter, whether
the barony was limited to to heirs-male, or extended to
heirs-general. As Lady Jane Coke left her great fortune to a
lady of obscure birth, who had been her companion, who was
in no wise related to her, and who afterwards married the
late Earl of Pomfret, it is presumed that she had no issue
by either of her husbands. And I am desirous of knowing
whether the Lady Lucy had any issue by Sir William Morrice,
whose title is probably extinct, there being no such name in
the list of barons of either of the three kingdoms. If the
titles were not forfeited, and if the barony was granted by
writ, or extended to heirs-general, and if neither Lady Jane
nor Lady Lucy left issue, the barony of Wharton musts be in
abeyance between the representatives of Philip fourth Lord
Wharton, by his second wife, Jane, dau. of Arthur Goodwin.
Any information upon this subject, and particularly whether
the titles are considered as forfeited, will much oblige
Yours, &c.
VIATOR A.
|