|
Petition for Peace,
Carlisle
Parliamentary Proceedings of Lords and Commons in
1795.
January 22.
Mr. Curwen presented a petition from the inhabitants
of Carlisle, for a speedy and effectual peace.
Lord Morpeth produced a protest, which, he said, was
signed by 12 or 1300 inhabitants, who, notwithstanding the
general inclination for a peace, did not agree or
participate in the proceedings of the petitioners. He spoke
much of the respectability of the persons signing the
protest; which was done from a sense of duty, and not in
consequence of any solicitation.
Mr. Curwen defended very zealously the character and
principles of the petitioners who drew up this address in
consequence of an adverisement calling for a public meeting.
It was a petition very far from partaking of the spirit of
party or opposition, which the subscribers not only
disclaimed for themselves, but also directed their
representatives to join with any gentlemen who were in
favour of peace, and not to be influenced in any degree by
the conduct of the party, by whom, from experience, they
knew they were liable to be deceived. Were the petition
drawn up in any other spirit, he should be ashamed to bring
it before the House. He was sure that it was not
manufactured, nor was any influence used in bringing it
forward, though he was very well assured that very active
influence was employed in producing their protest. The
characters of the petitioners were exceedingly well known,
as they consisted of the most respectable inhabitants of
Carlisle.
Mr. Wallace did not deny but that some of the
signatures to the petition were highly respectable; but,
with regard to the generality of them, he would not pretend
to say any thing. Their object he could by no means commend,
as it seemed intended to obstruct the operations of
Government: nor was it sanctioned by a majority of the
inhabitants of Carlisle, and of the county of Cumberland in
general. The only argument adduced to prove that it conveyed
the general sense of the inhabitants was, that it came from
a public meeting, convened by advertisement. It was not,
however, his opinion, that the sense of the country was
accurately collected by such meetings; besides, the petition
was not signed by the chairman, by order of the meeting, but
signatures taken individually, and persons invited for that
purpose. It was but too notorious, that petitions could in
this manner be procured for almost any cause; and the
straights the abettors of the petition were driven to were
evident, from their applying for signatures to strangers and
children, one of whom was a boy of 13 years of age,
apprentice to a hair-dresser. He confessed there was a very
ardent wish for peace, but it was not for a premature peace,
but one consistent with the honor, interests, and the safety
of the country.
Mr. Fox was sorry the advisers of the protest had not
drawn it up in a shape which would admit of its being
received by the House. For then it would appear, that the
opinions of the subscribers to the petition, and those to
the protest, were precisely the same respecting the
necessity for an immediate peace, and that they only
differed on the propriety of making in this way any
application to Parliament.
The Chancellor of the Exchequer, on the other hand,
contended, the subscribers to the protest having declared
their desire for peace, when Parliament in their wisdom
should think proper, possessed an object perfectly distinct
from the petitioners, who desired a peace at present, on
whatever terms it might be gained. The address was not
signed till after Parliament, in its address to the throne,
had declared, that a secure and honourable peace was only to
be obtained by a vigourous persecution of the war, and the
subscribers, in submitting to their prudence and wisdom,
professed to entertain the same opinion as the House.
The question, that the petition do lie upon the table, was
put, and carried.
... ...
|