|  | Roman Altar, Old  
Carlisle 
 Mr URBAN,
 AS you have often obliged the public with accounts of  
British and Roman antiquities, which have been 
discovered in various parts of this island, I send you the  
best drawing I could make of two Roman altars and a  
trough, which were very lately found by some workmen as they 
were digging for the foundation of a ring wall against the  
common at old Carlisle, about 200 yards east of a  
Roman legionary garrison. The Agger's praetorium,  
ditches, and roads belonging to this station are still to be 
traced by their remains on this uncultivated common, and the 
Alae Auxiliariae appears by many scattered ruins to  
have encamped eastward a long way.
 Some doubt has been made what was the antient name of this  
place. Mr Cambden gives it no name, though he calls  
it a famous city: It is indeed most probable that he never  
saw it, for there are no remains of building besides the  
fort, of which the wall is here and there still to be seen,  
and some wretched huts, which seem to have been cobbled up  
by private soldiers, merely to shelter them from the  
weather, for the remains of them are of very bad stone,  
though there is a good quarry at a little distance, to which 
recourse would certainly have been had if any regular  
edifices had been raised for more durable purposes, many of  
which there must have been to constitute a city.
 Dr Stukeley supposes it have been the Castra  
Exploratorum, but this also is a very improbable  
conjecture, for it cannot be thought that Antonine  
would have begun his itinerary for London here, and  
computed 12 stadia to Bowness, 12 to Carlisle, 
and 20 to Penrith, and so on, because this rout, as  
is plain from the map, is far from being the shortest way,  
which the Romans, who were eminent for accuracy and  
expedition, always took.
 Mr Horsley, with much greater appearance of truth,  
supposes this place to be the antient Olenacum, and  
to be garrisoned by the Alae Herculeana. This  
question, however, would probably be ascertained, if the  
remainder of the stone, Fig. I. can be found, for which I  
have directed diligent search to be made, because on this  
fragment will be seen the name of the cohort which should  
immediately precede the words cui praeest.
 The date of this stone is ascertained, as it is said to be  
consecrated by one AElius Septimianus Rusticus, a  
praefect in the consulship of Maternus and  
Bradua.
 The other stone, Fig. II. is also incompleat, but this seems 
to have been mutilated at the side by the Romans  
themselves, for there are marks of their pick all over it.  
It is dedicated to the health of Septimus Severus,  
the great triumpher over Britain, and builder of the  
stone wall, the ruins of which 1500 years have not mouldered 
away.
 Fig. III. is a trough to the use of which I confess myself  
wholly a stranger, and should be glad to see the conjectures 
of some of your ingenious correspondents on the subject.
 The altars, Fig. I. and II. are about two feet high, and 15  
inches thick; there is no fire place on the top of them, nor 
any sacrificial vessels on the sides, yet the workmanship is 
not contemptible. The trough is 22 inches long, 14 wide, and 
six deep; the rim is about 4 inches and an half; the letters 
are about 3 inches, very legible, none of them being  
defaced.
 The inscriptions I read thus:
 
  
Fig. I. Cui praeest AElius Septimianus Rusticus  
praefectus Materno et Bradua Consulibus. 
Fig. II. Jovi Optimo maximo pro Salute  
Imperatoris Septimi Severi Marcus  
Aurelius Antoninus. 
 |