|
Roman Altar, Old
Carlisle
Mr URBAN,
AS you have often obliged the public with accounts of
British and Roman antiquities, which have been
discovered in various parts of this island, I send you the
best drawing I could make of two Roman altars and a
trough, which were very lately found by some workmen as they
were digging for the foundation of a ring wall against the
common at old Carlisle, about 200 yards east of a
Roman legionary garrison. The Agger's praetorium,
ditches, and roads belonging to this station are still to be
traced by their remains on this uncultivated common, and the
Alae Auxiliariae appears by many scattered ruins to
have encamped eastward a long way.
Some doubt has been made what was the antient name of this
place. Mr Cambden gives it no name, though he calls
it a famous city: It is indeed most probable that he never
saw it, for there are no remains of building besides the
fort, of which the wall is here and there still to be seen,
and some wretched huts, which seem to have been cobbled up
by private soldiers, merely to shelter them from the
weather, for the remains of them are of very bad stone,
though there is a good quarry at a little distance, to which
recourse would certainly have been had if any regular
edifices had been raised for more durable purposes, many of
which there must have been to constitute a city.
Dr Stukeley supposes it have been the Castra
Exploratorum, but this also is a very improbable
conjecture, for it cannot be thought that Antonine
would have begun his itinerary for London here, and
computed 12 stadia to Bowness, 12 to Carlisle,
and 20 to Penrith, and so on, because this rout, as
is plain from the map, is far from being the shortest way,
which the Romans, who were eminent for accuracy and
expedition, always took.
Mr Horsley, with much greater appearance of truth,
supposes this place to be the antient Olenacum, and
to be garrisoned by the Alae Herculeana. This
question, however, would probably be ascertained, if the
remainder of the stone, Fig. I. can be found, for which I
have directed diligent search to be made, because on this
fragment will be seen the name of the cohort which should
immediately precede the words cui praeest.
The date of this stone is ascertained, as it is said to be
consecrated by one AElius Septimianus Rusticus, a
praefect in the consulship of Maternus and
Bradua.
The other stone, Fig. II. is also incompleat, but this seems
to have been mutilated at the side by the Romans
themselves, for there are marks of their pick all over it.
It is dedicated to the health of Septimus Severus,
the great triumpher over Britain, and builder of the
stone wall, the ruins of which 1500 years have not mouldered
away.
Fig. III. is a trough to the use of which I confess myself
wholly a stranger, and should be glad to see the conjectures
of some of your ingenious correspondents on the subject.
The altars, Fig. I. and II. are about two feet high, and 15
inches thick; there is no fire place on the top of them, nor
any sacrificial vessels on the sides, yet the workmanship is
not contemptible. The trough is 22 inches long, 14 wide, and
six deep; the rim is about 4 inches and an half; the letters
are about 3 inches, very legible, none of them being
defaced.
The inscriptions I read thus:
Fig. I. Cui praeest AElius Septimianus Rusticus
praefectus Materno et Bradua Consulibus.
Fig. II. Jovi Optimo maximo pro Salute
Imperatoris Septimi Severi Marcus
Aurelius Antoninus.
|