|  | Hen. VII.) that it was death by the English laws  
for any man to weare a Visard, with many like errors in  
his History, of our Trials by XII. Shrives,  
Coate of the Kingdome, Parliaments, and other  
like; Bartol's delivering the custome in this Isle to 
be, [star] quod Primogenitus succedit in omnibus  
Bonis; The Greeke Chalcondylas his slanderous  
description of our usuall forme of kinde entertainment to  
begin with the Wives Courteous admission to that most  
affected pleasure of Lascivious fancy (he was deceiv'd by  
misunderstanding the Reports of Our Kissing  
Salutations, given and accepted amongst us with more  
freedom then in any part of the Southern world, erroneously  
thinking, perhaps, that every Kisse must be thought seconded 
with that addition to the Seven promist by Mercury in 
name of Venus to him that should find Psyche;  
or as wanton, as Aristophanes his [...Greek...]) as  
many untruth's of like Nature in Others. Concerning the  
Arcadian deductions of our British Monarchy; within  
that time, from Brute, suppos'd about MMDCCCL. of the 
world (Samuel then Judge of Israel) unto some  
LIV. before Christ about when, Julius Caesar  
visited the Island) no Relation was extant, which is now  
left to our use. How then are they, which pretend  
Chronologies of that Age without any Fragment of Authors  
before Gildas, Taliesin and Nennius (the  
eldest of which was since D. of Christ) to be  
credited? For my part, I beleeve much in them as I do the  
finding of Hiero's Shipmast in our [star] Mountaines, 
which is collected upon a corrupted place in  
Athenaeus, cited out of Moschion; or, that  
Ptolemy Philapdelph sent to Reutha King of  
Scots some MDCCCC. years since, for discovery of this 
Country, which Claude Ptolomy afterwards put in his  
Geography; or that Julius Caesar built Arthurs  
Hoffen in Stirling Shirifdome; or, that  
Britons were at the Rape of Hesione with  
Hercules, as our excellent wit Joseph of  
Excester (published falsly under name of Cornelius 
Nepos) singeth: which are even equally warrantable, as  
Ariosto's Narrations of Persons and Places in  
Rowlands, Spensers Elfin Story, or Rablais his 
strange discoveries. Yet the Capricious faction will (I  
know) never quit their Beliefe of wrong; although some  
Elias or Delian Diver should make open what is 
so inquired after. Briefly, untill Polybius, who  
wrote neere MDCCC. since (for Aristotle [...Greek...] 
is cleerely counterfeited in title) no Greeke  
mentions the Isle; untill Lucreti' (some C. years  
later) no Roman hath exprest a thought of us; untill  
Caesars Commentaries, no piece of its description was 
known, that is now left to posterity. For time therfore  
preceding Caesar, I dare trust none; but with Others  
adhere to Conjecture. In Ancient matter since, I  
relie on Tacitus and Dio especially,  
Vopiscus, Capitolin, Spartian (for so much as they  
have, and the rest of the Augustan Story) afterwards  
Gildas, Nennius (but little is left of them, and that 
of the last very imperfect) Bede, Asserio, Ethelwerd  
(neere of bloud to King Alfred) William of  
Malmesbury, Marian, 
 | 
 
 
|  | [star2] Unum blandientis, as pulsu~ lingue longe  
mellisum. Apuleius De Aur. Asin. 6. and you may  
remember (as like enough he did) that in Plautus Curcul.  
Qui vult Cubare pangit saltem suavium, & such more  
in other wanton Poets, with the opinio~ of Baldus,  
that a Kisse in those Southerne Nations, is sufficient  
consent to imperfit espousels, nothing of that kind, but  
Copulation, with us & our neighbouring  
Dutch being so. 
 |