|
Biography, John Paul
Jones
book review
The Life of John Paul Jones, from original
Documents in the Possession of John Henry Sherburne,
Esq. Register of the Navy of the United States.
8vo. pp.320. Murray.
BEFORE entering upon the review of this work, we beg to lay
down certain premises. 1. That Paul Jones was not an
American. 2. That the American war was a civil war. 3. That
American war naval-fighting was, with very few exceptions,
not spirit-proof. 4. That our American war ministry was a
feeble one. 5. That the merit of Jones, and of all the
officers in the American service, is and must be English,
and is not greater nor so great as that of many gallant
warriors who fought under the British flag in the subsequent
revolutionary war.
John Paul (Jones) was the son of John Paul, a gardener, and
was born July 1747, at Abergland in the stewartry of
Kirkcudbright in Scotland. He received the rudiments of his
education at the parochial school of Kirkbean. The
contiguity of his residence to Solway Firth, gave him an
early predilection for a seafaring life; and at the age of
twelve he was apprenticed to a merchant in the American
trade. When his apprenticeship was expired, he made several
trading voyages, and suffered from the ill conduct of his
partner. In 1773 he was arranging the affairs of a brother
who had died intestate in Virginia, and was (probably
through pecuniary difficulties) then living in a very
retired manner in America. About the time mentioned he
adopted the name of Jones. In the 28th year of his age, he
offered his services to Congress, and was appointed a first
Lieutenant in the American Navy. The Alfred, in which he was
employed, proved unsuccessful, but the courts-martial held
in consequence were so advantageous to the reputation of
Jones, that he was appointed to the command of the
Providence, a sloop of 12 six-pounders. When Congress
directed the building of thirteen frigates, he was, however,
disappointed in obtaining the command of one. He was not
discouraged, but wisely exhibited zeal, by memorializing the
American Government concerning the improvement of their
Navy, and cruizing very successfully against our trade. He
also planned expeditions against the Newfoundland fishery,
the coast of Africa, &c.
Such was American war fighting on our part, that he escaped
in his humble sloop two frigates, after a sharp contest with
one of them. In 1776 he commanded a squadron against Isle
Royal, made several captures, and soon after was promoted to
the rank of Captain. In his command of the Ranger, he made a
descent upon Whitehaven, spiked the cannon in the fort,
landed a boat's crew in St. Mary's Isle (which crew without
his approbation carried away the Earl of Selkirk's plate),
and captured the Drake of Twenty guns, off Carrickfergus,
the Captain and Lieutenant being both killed.
That a single frigate could effect all this in the very
chops of the channel, was evidently neglect in our
Government. The steed was stolen, because they did not lock
the stable door. But there was another error. The treatment
of the American prisoners of war in England was so
impolitically harsh *, that every American sailor was
thus stimulated to prefer death to captivity; and as the
naval tactics of the two countries were the same, and as
locality of birth was the only distinction between English
and Americans, it is not to be wondered at that the latter
were successful: but could they have been so, if they had
not been of English character and habits? The merit
of success is due to Great Britain, if the answer to this
question be the just one. It appears also, that they would
have been much more mischievous to us, if there had not
existed in their Navy the very evil which certain of our
popular Reformers want to introduce into our own, and which
would have the same result, as their pretended amelioration
of the Combination Laws. - We allude to the proposed Trials
by Jury, and
|