|
Licences to
Crenellate
HOUSES OF THE MIDDLE AGES.
MR. URBAN, - You are doubtless aware that I have been for
some years engaged upon a work on the "Domestic Architecture
of the Middle Ages in England," of which a portion has
already appeared; and as I belive that your readers are as
much interested in this subject as myself, I have no scruple
in asking your assistance in rendering my work as complete
and as accurate as possible. With that view, most important
information is to be obtained from the Licences to
Crenallate, as few houses of any consequence were built in
those days without being fortified, and that could not be
done without a licence from the suzerain. All such licences
granted by the crown in England in the fourteenth and
fifteenth centuries, are recorded in the Patent Rolls
preserved in the Tower of London; and as but little reliance
can be placed on the printed copy of those Rolls for such a
purpose, where minute accuracy is necessary, I applied to
Mr. Duffus Hardy, the Deputy-keeper of the Records in the
Tower, and he very obligingly employed competent persons,
accustomed to the reading of these Roles, to make out for me
a complete list of all such licences as occur in them. This
list I now beg you to present to your readers, and ask them
to give me such information as the local knowledge of each
enables him to supply, as to what remains there are still
existing of any of these houses; or if there are no remains,
what vestigesthere are to mark the spot where the house
formerly stood. I believe that in almost every instance, it
will be found on investigation, that some traces exist -
either the moat or the mound; or in cases where the site has
been built upon, the name has most commonly been preserved.
In some instances, I know that the houses remain almost
entire, and of course the date of the licence to fortify it
gives us within a very few years the exact date of the
building. This is of great assistance in the history of
architecture, and may in some instances enable us to correct
erroneous notions, and shew that the changes of style began
to take place at an earlier period than is commonly
supposed. I have not, however, at present found any
instances in which the actual date has differed materially
from that which I should have assigned to it from the style
alone, or such as I have already assigned to similar
buildings in the "Glossary of Architecture."
Your obedient servant,
J. H. PARKER.
Oxford, July, 1856.
P.S. - I have already obtained information respecting a few
of these houses, but hope now to be able to carry on the
investigation more thoroughly, and purpose devoting a part
of my time during the summer months to seeing such examples
as appear to be most worthy of notice. I have added a few
short notices respecting some of these houses, and it would
be easy to enlarge them, but I fear that the bare list of
licences will occupy more of your valuable space than you
may be willing or able coveniently to spare. I shall be glad
to know from any of your learned readers whether the
variations of form which occur in the Rolls, such as
manerium, mansum manerii, &c., imply any
different kind of house of greater or less importance, or
are mere variations of the scribe, and therefore not worth
noticea.
|