|
Gentleman's Magazine 1851 part 1 p.582
The immediate result was such as might have been
anticipated. He went to Oxford in his nineteenth year with
no very accurate knowledge of Greek and Latin, therefore no
match for Eton-trained scholars in competition for
distinctions awarded according to Etonian standards, but
with a mind full of original thoughts and general knowledge,
and a rare gift of lively and eloquent discourse. "He would
hold forth by the hour (for no one wished to interrupt him)
on whatever subject might have been started, either of
literature, politics, or religion, with an originality of
thought, a force of illustration, and a facility and beauty
of expression, which I question (says Mr. Dyce, writing in
the year 1849) whether any man living except his father,
could have surpassed." Whether the popularity at
wine-parties which was the inevitable consequence of such a
gift, interfered much with his reading during the first year
or two of his residence, we are not informed. But in the
summer of 1818, as we learn from Mr. C. H. Townshend (who
then first met him, and has recorded his impressions in a
long and interesting letter) he was certainly reading hard.
At Michaelmas following he took a second class in in
literis humanioribus; his deficiencies in what is
exclusively, and somewhat arbitrarily, called "scholarship,"
sinking him below the place which his "talent and general
knowledge" would have raised him. Soon after, he obtained an
Oriel fellowship with great distinction; and it seems as if
he were now honorable providied for, and as if the kindness
of the friends by whose help he had been sent to college had
received its best reward.
Had it turned out so, it is probable that the brief outline
which we have given of his school and college life might
have been thought to contain all that needed to be
remembered of it. It might not have been suspected that any
material feature of his character remained unnoticed. But a
fellow-elect of Oriel has to pass one year of probation, at
the end of which, in case of misconduct, his election may be
cancelled. At the close of this probationary year, Hartley
Coleridge was judged to have forfeited his fellowship, "on
the ground mainly of intemperance." Great efforts were made
in vain at the time to get the decision reversed; and sever
comments have been made upon it since. We have ourselves
heard it confidently asserted by a very high and grave
authority, - a man by no means given to think indulgently of
intemperance, or suspiciously fo dignities, and one whom the
question must have deeply interested at the time, - that the
charge of intemperance was in fact a pretext only, and that
the real offence was of quite another kind, less venial
perhaps in the eyes of college authorities, though not so
easily reached by their statutes, and, in the eyes of the
world, no offence at all, - namely, an indiscreet freedom of
speech with regard to University reforms. Upon this point we
can only say that the narrative before us gives us no means
of forming an opinion. We have no account either of the
specific charges, or of the evidence, or of the answers.
Judging, however, from the tenor of Hartley's subsequent
life, we can hardly assume that he had been guilty of no
irregularities which formed a fair pretext for rejecting
him, and (remembering how just his views were, and how
pungent his remarks, upon established institutions in
general,) we can have little doubt that he had said
many things extremely offensive to the ears of authority,
though perhaps not on that account the less wholesome, had
they been weighed and considered.
But what, it will be asked, were these
irregularities? And how did they come upon him? For hitherto
we have heard of no evil tendencies of any kind. To this
question neither his brother's recollections nor the
evidence which he has collected from others, enable us to
give a satisfactory answer. We cannot attach much weight to
early manifestations of "intense sensibility" not under
proper control; of "impatience of constraint;" of a
disposition to "shrink from mental pain;" of occasional
"paroxysms of rage, during which he bit his arm or finger
violently;" of a proneness "to yield unconsciously to slight
temptations, as if swayed by a mechanical impulse apart from
his volition;" for not only are such infirmities incident
more or less to the youth of all large and sensitive
natures, but it does no
|