|
Sir John Barrow
New St. Spring Gardens, Feb. 12.
MR. URBAN,
IN your last month's Magazine you have given what the writer
truly terms an "imperfect catalogue" of articles by various
authors in the Quarterly Review, from its commencement to
vol.XIX. with an intention to continue the catalogue.
Now, as the contributions of my father Sir John Barrow to
that incomparable work appear thus "curtailed of all fair
proportion," and as I am possession of a complete list of
his contributions, I send you, with his permission, in a
general way, the extent to which his assistance has been
afforded to his late excellent friend Mr. Gifford, one of
the best scholars and most able critics of the age.
The writer of your former essay is no doubt aware that a
committee of gentlemen, consisting of Mr. Canning, Sir
Walter Scott, Mr. Hookham Frere, Mr. George Ellis, and one
or two more, originated the Quarterly Review, and were, with
the aid of Mr. Gifford, the chief contributors to the first
two or three volumes. But as this could not long continue
without further assistance, Mr. Canning urged my father
strongly on this point, who was not disposed, either on
public or private grounds, to refuse compliance with a
request so reasonable from one who had always acted towards
him with cordiality and kindness, and as my father had just
published a volume on China and the Chinese, he selected for
his first essay of reviewing De Guigne's Account of
the Dutch Embassy to Pekin, which appeared in vol.ii. No.4,
and from that time to vol.xix. inclusive, instead of 9
articles, which in your catalogue are correctly ascribed to
Sir John Barrow, he actually furnished, as appears by my
list, no less than 75 articles, and from the commencement to
the end of vol.xxxi (No.62) the number he supplied amounted
to 134. At this period Mr. Gifford's illness obliged him to
resign his editorship.
Mr. (now Sir John) Coleridge succeeded him for a short time,
during which my father continued as a contributor, and also
with Mr. Lockhart, the present editor, but to no great
extent, having only supplied from No.62 to No.145 for
January of the present year, 1844, 69 articles, the last of
them being, as the first was, on Chinese affairs.
Thus then the whole number supplied in the course of 35
years amounts to 203, of which you would not thank me for a
detailed account, nor do I consider myself entitled to give
it; but, if the following summary will answer your purpose,
you are at liberty to insert it:-
|