|
Landscape Painting
Book review.
This extract is included, though it is not directly about
The Lakes, because such a lot is made of the qualities of
Claude, Poussin. and Salvator Rosa, in discussing the
picturesque in this geographical area. The views of this
author are, thus, interesting. They also provide an insight
into the art criticism of the age; and perhaps the
exclusiveness of art criticism today.
Modern Painters: their Superiority in the Art of
Landscape Painting to the Ancient Masters. By a Graduate of
Oxford. 8vo. Vol.I.
IF the lovers of poetry were to be suddenly informed that
they had been all their lives worshipping at the shrine of
false gods, and mistaking the effusions of ignorance and
weakness for the inspirations of genius; if they were told
that our elder poets - those venerable names that appeared
in such unrivalled lustre in the reigns of Elizabeth and
James - were ignorant of the art they professed,
unacquainted with its essential principles, and working in
feebleness and error; that in their delineations of human
passion and character they deviated from nature and truth;
that we must cease to look on them as the models of
excellence, but turn our admiration to the modern school;
that Shakespeare and Milton were not to be compared for
power, or truth, or splendour of genius, or richness of
invention, to Southey, or Shelley, or Sheridan Knowles; if
such startling assertions were advanced, they could not well
be more surprised than the connoisseurs and critics of a
sister art will be, who have been bred up in admiration of
the works of the old masters, and who have looked on their
high reputation as authentic and undeniable, when they find
the hitherto illustrious names of Claude and Poussin, of
Titian and Salvator Rosa, of Vandevelde and Cuyp, placed, in
very essential points, below those of Stanfield and Harding,
of Fielding and Prout; while one single and illustrious name
is elevated above all modern or ancient, and the assemblage
of every excellence discovered and illustrated in the works
of Mr. J. W. Turner. Such is the purpose of this work; and
the boldness of its design is well supported by the
diligence, and knowledge, and skilfulness displayed in the
execution. The author has laid a solid foundation in the
broad and philosophical principles he applies to the art;
while, in the very minute, exact, and delicate criticism he
delivers, he shows a practical and artist-like acquaintance
with the details of the subject. If his theory is wrong, if
his reasonings are incorrect, and his conclusions not
warranted, it must arise from other causes than from
unacquaintance with his subject, from indolence in the
collection of his materials, or unskilfulness in using them;
for undoubtedly he has deeply investigated the laws and
principles of the art he discusses; he has dwelt on it with
a lover's fondness, and studied it with a critics attention.
He is also an eloquent and impressive writer; he has a
command of expression adapted to the sentiments he wishes to
convey, and can describe the captivating beauties of
painting in the brilliant colour of poetic diction. It is
the work of one who confidently believes in the opinions he
maintains, and who is armed against any argument that can be
brought to oppose him. It is not the production of a flimsy
theorist, content to obtain a temporary reputation by
shallow paradoxes and startling assertions, nor of one who
from some partial motive is desirous to raise the reputation
of a particular artist or school of artists above their
rivals; but of a person who, having devoted a very great
attention to a favourite subject, and having acquired an
intimate knowledge of its productions at home and abroad,
has pronounced to the world the truths he has discovered
|