|
Gentleman's Magazine 1825 part 2 p.431
to our Admiral. But this is all of which we could ever hear.
Paul Jones adds,
'The English are very deficient in signals as well as in
naval tactics.' P.184.
Sir Home Popham has, we believe, most importantly improved
the former; and, for the latter, let the late war speak.
Pauls says, that he never knew any thing of naval tactics
till he was acquainted 'with that great tactician
Count d'Orvilliers and his judicious assistant the Chevalier
du Pavillion.' p.185. Now those tactics were merely to
escape defeat, not to gain victory; but the English broke
the line, and what became of the great tacticians?
Here ended Paul's days of glory. Except as a diplomatist,
and a Rear Admiral under the Russian service, in which he
defeated the Turks (as the Greeks have done by fire-ships
only), we hear no more of Paul Jones. The Proditori nulla
fides followed him wherever he went. His bravery and
talent were respected, but his principles were
questioned. The Court of Denmark pensioned him, to buy off a
dangerous man; and the Empress Catharine made a tool of him
as long as he was wanted: but to suppose that the Monarchs
of Europe would entangle themselves with him and the
republican doctrines of America, was utterly absurd.
Catharine soaped his nose with the order of St. Anne, then
pulled it, and he retired into France, assigning his
dismissal to the intrigues of the English, and died at Paris
in June 1791. The National Assembly went into mourning on
account of his death, and no doubt wore the same clothes for
many of their own relatives, whom the flattery of Paul Jones
and the politics of America had brought to an untimely end
by the guillotine.
We will, however, do justice to the really great personal
merits of Paul Jones. Born in obscurity, with the
consciousness of superior talents, America presented an
opening for the exertion of them, which he never could have
found in the old countries, without going through the usual
routine of service, which at the age of twenty-eight was
impracticable. In commerce he had been unsuccessful; and
desperation made him an adventurer. Qualified for a hero, as
a warrior, a statesman, and as a gentleman, he showed
invincible bravery, masterly diplomacy, and chivalrous
courtesy; but what shall we say to his unnatural hostility
to his native country, - a country remarkable for
nationality. He was a Scotchman, who formed a plan
for plundering Edinburgh; he was a fighting
Fauntleroy, instead of a banking one; and would have preyed
upon the funds and vitals of his relatives, his friends, and
countrymen. Most Scotchmen would prefer death. Bernadotte
never entered France, and him Napoleon had tried to depose.
What had Scotland done to Paul Jones?
In short, as an officer, his conduct is a good
exemplar, and for that object his life ought to be studied.
In all other respects, he was an unnatural parricide. He had
not suffered by the American war; nor had his country
injured him in any shape.
|