|  
 
 
Page ix:- 
  
great contest for empire between the kings of France and 
England. The finest library in the world owed its 
destruction to the Alexandrine war, which took its rise from 
an amorous interview between Caesar and Cleopatra; and the 
pitiful logic of an Arabian zealot destroyed another. But 
instances of such events are numberless, nor are those fewer 
the execution of which depend on multitudes. Thus the 
over-forwardness and wantonness of a tax-gatherer caused the 
mighty insurrection of the Kentish Commons which disturbed 
the reign of Richard II.; and the steadiness of a poor, old, 
insignificant priest, first gave consistency to the 
Reformation in Scotland. The confinement of a few gladiators 
gave being to troubles which challenged the strength of the 
Roman Legions; and these outrages in Judea, which did not 
terminate but in the almost entire extinction of the Jewish 
name, are generally referred to the dismission of some 
workmen from the building of the last Temple. I forbear 
further instances; and shall only ask, To what more 
important cause can we ascribe those religious quarrels with 
which almost the whole world has at times been disturbed? 
Whoever considers the vanity, or superstition, or other 
weaknesses incident to the most eminent men, will not wonder 
at such things as strange, any more than that the falling of 
an apple should suggest to the comprehensive soul of Newton, 
the idea of that great principle which regulates all nature. 
Though these same weaknesses in the minds of the multitude 
may perhaps operate with a greater force, there generally 
are found some more remote, or perhaps collateral incidents, 
necessary to give them effect; of which we might bring 
illustrations: but I am afraid that this digression is 
already too long; I only meant it as an argument of my more 
immediate subject, to which I therefore return. 
  
 |  
 
 
 |  
 
The disturbances on the borders of England and Scotland have 
frequently been the plea, and sometimes the cause of most 
serious affairs; yet these disturbances, (such was the 
temper of the people,) were begun, and continually fostered 
by the most unaccountable trifles. If they met at a fair, or 
a merry-making, some or other of them got engaged in a 
quarrel; each party had numerous favourers or abettors, and 
thus the contest became general: it was carried home by 
every individual, and they only came back to revenge it. 
Thus mutual insults and injuries made mutual complaints and 
justifications necessary; these delayed the cure, and this 
delay was not a little increased by the strange nature of 
the laws which prevailed in those districts: the mischief, 
in consequence, received continual increase, till it became 
of a size for general history. In the year 1369, a fair was 
held at Roxburgh during a peace between the two nations: at 
this fair a quarrel arose amongst the Borderers, as was 
generally the case, and a Scotsman, servant to the Earl of 
March, was killed. Amongst the customs, and even laws of 
these strange people, a certain atonement for blood was one; 
and this atonement not being made on the present occasion, 
his master took up the quarrel, in which he was assisted by 
the Gordon and others. These began to ravage the opposite 
marches in a terrible manner, and of course called forth the 
Wardens of those marches, Sir John Silburn, and the Piercy, 
to repel the invasion, and to take vengeance by similar 
means. Thus the confines at large of both kingdoms, and the 
counties adjoining, became in a great measure, a scene of 
desolation: and considerable numbers of men perished, in 
several rough encounters, during its continuance. Again: In 
the year 1377, another fair was held at Roxburgh, which was 
terminated by a similar quarrel, in which the town itself 
was burnt. To revenge this, the Piercy, now Earl of 
Northumberland, entered Scotland with an army, which is said 
to have consisted of ten thousand men, and for three days 
ravaged the lands of the Earl of March. Hunting parties, 
besides, were productive of frequent outrages. I do not mean 
such parties as were made sometimes in open defiance by the 
turbulent and powerful chieftains of the north; but the 
poaching companies, who seldom or never desired a fair 
field, nor were prepared for much opposition. It is somewhat 
singular, that though, in times of peace, people of the one 
march were seldom hindred, upon asking leave, to hunt in the 
waste grounds of the other; yet the humor was such, as very 
seldom to use any such friendly application. Hence, the 
hunters were generally driven home again, and punished, 
according to the spirit of the times, by a few robberies, 
slaughters, and burnings within their own boundaries. Thus 
was a war begun, which spread, sometimes 
  
 |