|  | Gentleman's Magazine 1848 part 2 p.31 MR. URBAN,
 ALTHOUGH the anonymous form of the very extraordinary attack 
by your OLD SUBSCRIBERS (vol.XXIX. p.618) on my description  
of Brougham Hall might well excuse my replying to it, yet I  
feel it due both to my own character and to your readers to  
request the insertion of the following remarks.
 The point-blank denials, - such as, "the hall does not stand 
upon the Roman station," "there was no tower," "Udard de  
Brougham was not governor of Appleby Castle," &c. - it  
would be easy for me to answer in like manner by  
re-insisting upon those facts detailed in my letter, and  
with quite as much propriety; for if you must in common  
justice allow my description, although compiled in great  
measure from memory, and for the amusement of a friend, is  
quite as likely to be true as the ostentatious accusations  
put forth by your correspondents, without even a shadow of  
an attempt at proof.
 They say that I wish to impress upon your readers that  
Brougham Hall, as it at present exists, has done so for  
centuries; and yet, if they had not read my letter with  
jaundiced eyes, they must have noticed that I repeatedly  
speak of renovations and alterations as having taken place,  
and still taking place. I knew that the house had been  
extensively re-edified, and never wished to convey a  
contrary impression, or for a moment supposed I was doing  
so; neither do I think iin looking over my letter that such  
an impression is at all given.
 It is ridiculous to say, because a house has been repaired  
and in part rebuilt, that therefore the whole is a modern  
structure; and it is anything but just to accuse me of  
falsifying, because I have not stated the exact time when  
such repairs were made. Who, in popularly describing Warwick 
Castle or any other old mansion, is expected to name the  
different periods when every late alteration was  
made?* I am not
 
 | 
 
 
|  | * Since writing the above, I have received a note  
from a person to whom I applied for information to rebut  
your correspondents' charges, and I send you an extract:  
"Bearing always in mind that some parts, particularly the  
upper portion of the old tower, the old kitchen, and part of 
the west front, had, from decay, been [continued on next  
page] repaired, and in some parts wholly rebuilt, but with  
the old materials, between the years 1828 and 1830. The  
kitchen part fell down, and was replaced by what is now the  
great staircase in 1842. The timbering of the old tower was  
uninjured, as was the trap-door part, and is now in its old  
place. It is of very early date, as anybody who knows  
anything of old woodwork can at once see. In the same way  
the ceiling of the old drawing room was saved, being  
suspended by ropes fixed to the rigging while the defective  
portion of the west wall was repaired." 
 |