|
Gentleman's Magazine 1848 part 2 p.31
MR. URBAN,
ALTHOUGH the anonymous form of the very extraordinary attack
by your OLD SUBSCRIBERS (vol.XXIX. p.618) on my description
of Brougham Hall might well excuse my replying to it, yet I
feel it due both to my own character and to your readers to
request the insertion of the following remarks.
The point-blank denials, - such as, "the hall does not stand
upon the Roman station," "there was no tower," "Udard de
Brougham was not governor of Appleby Castle," &c. - it
would be easy for me to answer in like manner by
re-insisting upon those facts detailed in my letter, and
with quite as much propriety; for if you must in common
justice allow my description, although compiled in great
measure from memory, and for the amusement of a friend, is
quite as likely to be true as the ostentatious accusations
put forth by your correspondents, without even a shadow of
an attempt at proof.
They say that I wish to impress upon your readers that
Brougham Hall, as it at present exists, has done so for
centuries; and yet, if they had not read my letter with
jaundiced eyes, they must have noticed that I repeatedly
speak of renovations and alterations as having taken place,
and still taking place. I knew that the house had been
extensively re-edified, and never wished to convey a
contrary impression, or for a moment supposed I was doing
so; neither do I think iin looking over my letter that such
an impression is at all given.
It is ridiculous to say, because a house has been repaired
and in part rebuilt, that therefore the whole is a modern
structure; and it is anything but just to accuse me of
falsifying, because I have not stated the exact time when
such repairs were made. Who, in popularly describing Warwick
Castle or any other old mansion, is expected to name the
different periods when every late alteration was
made?* I am not
|
|
* Since writing the above, I have received a note
from a person to whom I applied for information to rebut
your correspondents' charges, and I send you an extract:
"Bearing always in mind that some parts, particularly the
upper portion of the old tower, the old kitchen, and part of
the west front, had, from decay, been [continued on next
page] repaired, and in some parts wholly rebuilt, but with
the old materials, between the years 1828 and 1830. The
kitchen part fell down, and was replaced by what is now the
great staircase in 1842. The timbering of the old tower was
uninjured, as was the trap-door part, and is now in its old
place. It is of very early date, as anybody who knows
anything of old woodwork can at once see. In the same way
the ceiling of the old drawing room was saved, being
suspended by ropes fixed to the rigging while the defective
portion of the west wall was repaired."
|